Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Pendle Today
Sponsored by
To advertise on the website please contact Pendle Today Telephone 01282 478119
 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Out-of-control Earby brothers beat up shopper



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 June 2008
TWO drunken Earby brothers who beat up an innocent shopper in a terror off-licence attack are behind bars for 36 weeks.
Burnley Crown Court heard how Peter Lancaster was set upon by out-of-control Jonathan Farrell (19) and his brother Karl (23) in front of horrified members of the public as his girlfriend and staff tried to stop the onslaught.

Mr Lancaster, who knew his assailants, had passed the time of day with Jonathan Farrell, who told him: "I'm angry," before the melee in which the victim was grabbed from behind, pushed, thrown into displays, threatened, punched, kicked, had cans thrown at him and was headbutted.

The fracas was captured on CCTV and the defendants were said to be ashamed when they saw the footage. Staff eventually managed to get the brothers out of the store.

Sentencing, Judge Heather Lloyd said: "This was mindless, drunken violence in a public place on an entirely innocent victim and entirely innocent bystanders were sucked into this frightening incident."

The judge said there had been no provocation, both brothers were developing a pattern of gratuitous, alcohol-fuelled violent behaviour and their parents must be at their wits' end.

The Farrells, of Craven Court, Earby, admitted assault allegations on April 4th. Both have previous convictions.

For Karl Farrell, Elizabeth Nicholls said when sober the defendant conducted himself well, was usually in full-time work and could be a useful member of society. He was not working at the moment because of a serious injury.

Robert Elias, defending Jonathan Farrell, said the defendant was embarrassed when made to watch the video of what happened. His conduct had been boorish, drunken, loutish and was unacceptable.

Mr Elias went on: "The fact he is embarassed and ashamed of his behaviour is, in itself, refreshing and is perhaps indicative there can be a salvage operation."

The full article contains 316 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 June 2008 10:32 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Burnley
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.